The prevalence of congenital and early-onset hearing loss in Jordanian and Israeli infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study was to investigate the prevalence of congenital and early-onset hearing loss, and the influence of the known risk factors for hearing loss on infants in Jordan and Israel. Subjects were a total of nearly 17000 infants from both countries, including infants with and without risk factors for hearing loss. The hearing screening protocol included distortion product otoacoustic emission, followed in case of repeated OAE referral or high risk (HR) infant by diagnostic auditory brainstem responses. The results indicate that the prevalence and severity of hearing loss amongst Jordanian infants (1.37%) is remarkably higher as compared to the Israeli infants (0.48%). The overall prevalence of bilateral SNHL was seven times more in the Jordanian infants, 18 times in non-risk, and three times in the HR infants relative to the Israeli infants. Risk factors including family history, hyperbilirubinemia, bacterial meningitis, and associated syndromes were more prevalent amongst Jordanian infants. This unique study underscores the importance of sharing and exchanging information to create empirical data to guide health-care providers in adapting protocols to the local constraints in developing countries.SumarioObjetivo: Investigar la prevalencia de hipoacusias congénitas o de inicio temprano y la influencia de los factores de riesgo conocidos para sordera en niños de Jordania e Israel.Sujetos y materiales: Cerca de 17.000 infantes de ambos países participaron en el estudio, incluyendo niños con factores de riesgo y sin ellos. El protocolo de evaluación auditiva incluyó Emisiones Otoacústicas por Productos de Distorsión (DOPAE), seguido, en el caso de referencias repetidas de OAE, por Respuestas Auditivas del Tallo Cerebral (ABR).Resultados: La prevalencia y la severidad de los trastornos auditivos en niños de Jordania (1.37%) es marcadamente más alto en comparación con los niños israelitas (0.48%), especialmente en el caso de la SNHL bilateral, donde la prevalencia global en los niños jordanos era 7 veces mayor, 18 veces en los niños sin riesgo y 3 veces mayor en los infantes con HR, comparado con los israelitas. Los factores de riesgo, que incluían historia familiar, hiperbilirrubinemia, meningitis bacteriana y síndromes asociados, fueron más prevalentes entre los niños jordanos. Este estudio singular subraya la importancia de compartir e intercambiar información, para crear datos empíricos que guíen a los proveedores de salud en la adaptación de los protocolos a las limitaciones locales de cada país.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".