MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1864449204 · doi:10.1109/asru.2001.1034611

Joint estimation of noise and channel distortion in a generalized EM framework

2005· article· en· W1864449204 on OpenAlexaff
T. Krisjansson, Brendan J. Frey, Li Deng, Alex Acero

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationComputer scienceNoise (video)Channel (broadcasting)Distortion (music)Focus (optics)AlgorithmJoint (building)Convergence (economics)Noise measurementNoise reductionSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsImage (mathematics)EngineeringBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of speech cleaning and noise adaptation algorithms is heavily dependent on the quality of the noise and channel models. Various strategies have been proposed in the literature for adapting to the current noise and channel conditions. We describe the joint learning of noise and channel distortion in a novel framework called ALGONQUIN. The learning algorithm employs a generalized EM strategy wherein the E step is approximate. We discuss the characteristics of the new algorithm, with a focus on convergence rates and parameter initialization. We show that the learning algorithm can successfully disentangle the non-linear effects of noise and linear effects of the channel and achieve a relative reduction in WER of 21.8% over the non-adaptive algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207