MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1864758404 · doi:10.1039/c5cc90328a

Correction: A supramolecular approach for designing emissive solid-state carbazole arrays

2015· erratum· en· W1864758404 on OpenAlexaff
Liubov M. Lifshits, B.C. Noll, Jeremy K. Klosterman

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2015
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPolydiacetylene-based materials and applications
Canadian institutionsBruker (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbazoleSupramolecular chemistrySolid-stateMaterials scienceState (computer science)NanotechnologyCombinatorial chemistryComputer scienceChemistryPhotochemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryAlgorithmCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correction for ‘A supramolecular approach for designing emissive solid-state carbazole arrays’ by Liubov M. Lifshits et al. , Chem. Commun. , 2015, 51 , 11603–11606.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicPolydiacetylene-based materials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207