MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1864812830 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2000.884432

Trinocular data registration using a three-dimensional self-organizing feature map

2002· article· en· W1864812830 on OpenAlex
George K. Knopf, Archana Sangole

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)Feature vectorCurse of dimensionalityFeature extractionIdentification (biology)Object (grammar)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-dimensional self-organizing feature map (SOFM) that associates redundant and complementary features extracted from images acquired by a trinocular camera system is described. The combined features extracted from three views of the reference parts are used to train the SOFM. The unsupervised learning algorithm ensures that "similar" feature vectors will be assigned to cluster units that lie in close spatial proximity in the 3D feature map. The technique reduces the dimensionality of the input by exploiting hidden redundancies in the training data. During the identification phase, features in the novel test part activate a number of cluster units that have weights similar to the applied training input. If the sum-of-square error (SSE) between the input and weights of the cluster unit with the strongest response is greater than a predefined tolerance, then the test object is labeled as faulty part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it