Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the role of Peter Pan inscribed in J. M. Barrie’s Peter Pan or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up from a psychoanalytic viewpoint. The Lacanian meaning of “fantasy” is a kind of defense mechanism for covering over the lack of the Other. In other words, fantasy is a defense for the unbearable fact that the Other, which has been regarded as totality, or something able to fill the void or lack we have, also has its lack and therefore cannot cover over our lack. Peter Pan, in this sense, represents the anxiety of adults, not the dreams of children. It is the fantasy which simultaneously covers over while reveals the anxiety of (adult) audiences, and also defers and brings about the encounter with the lack they have. It is a defense mechanism against the anxieties of sexuality, death, and origin in a narrow sense, as well as a defense and exposure of the encounter with the real resulting from the lack of subject and the Other in a broad sense. In this sense, Peter Pan is the void signifier, which designates the place of the unsignifiable objet (petit) a, or the phallic signifier used to reveal the lack of the symbolic structure itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".