Case Study of Generic Competencies Assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: In 2007, the Faculty of Pharmacy of Universite de Montreal replaced its bachelor’s program with an all-new Doctor of Pharmacy Program, which uses a competency-based approach. In that setting, development of tools to monitor students’ progress in regards to generic competency was of crucial importance. Description of assessment method: Generic competencies and competency elements to be assessed were defined and assigned to each program course, and assessment tools were designed to create a generic competency profile for each student. Evaluation: Results from the first two cohorts of 200 students show that the new process meets the Faculty’s objectives. Strong agreement can already be seen on both exceptional and problem students, suggesting that our method is relatively reliable. Future plans: The information technology platform will be improved to allow students to view their individual file, on demand. We believe that this project will contribute to promoting generic competencies development in our students and help them sincerely commit to this goal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it