MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1865179386 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.056

Tools and Techniques for Real-time Data Acquisition and Analysis in Brain Computer Interface studies using qEEG and Eye Tracking in Virtual Reality Environment

2015· article· en· W1865179386 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tarik Boukhalfi, Christian C. Joyal, Stéphane Bouchard, Sarah Michelle Neveu, Patrice Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInstitut Philippe Pinel de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Human–computer interactionVirtual realityInterface (matter)Computer scienceEye trackingData acquisitionTracking (education)Virtual machineBrain–computer interfaceData sciencePsychologyArtificial intelligenceElectroencephalographyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the pipeline of data acquisition and analysis used in the ARViPL lab at the Montreal Philippe-Pinel Institute for different studies related to forensic psychiatry in Virtual Reality (VR) environment and we discuss the different challenges that we encounter during the experiments when combining different new technologies that help researchers to better understand the underlying mechanisms of various mental health disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207