MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1865379289 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2003.1216625

An efficient control of the series compensator for sag mitigation and voltage regulation

2004· article· en· W1865379289 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa I. Marei, Ehab F. El‐Saadany, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage sagControl theory (sociology)Series (stratigraphy)VoltageVoltage regulationComputer scienceControl (management)Voltage regulatorControl systemControl engineeringEngineeringPower qualityElectrical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The series compensator is a challenging solution for power quality problems related to the voltage. One of the most common control algorithms used for the series voltage compensator is the symmetrical component method. this paper introduces a new recursive least square (RLS) structure for symmetrical components estimation. This structure is capable of dealing with multioutput (MO) systems for parameter estimation and is called MO-RLS. A novel feed forward control based on the proposed MO-RLS is dictated for the series compensator not only to compensate for the zero and negative sequence components, but also to regulate the positive sequence component to the nominal load voltage. One advantage of the proposed control system is its insensitivity to parameters variation, a necessity for the series compensator. Simulations of the proposed algorithm are conducted to show the robustness, the high accuracy and the fast dynamic performance of the novel system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207