MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1865401041 · doi:10.1139/s08-017

Use of dairy sludge for the removal of some basic dyes

2008· article· en· W1865401041 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sumanjit, Tejinder Pal Singh Walia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalachite greenAdsorptionFreundlich equationSorbentEffluentLangmuirChemistryCrystal violetAqueous solutionMethylene bluePulp and paper industryChromatographyNuclear chemistryEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistryPhotocatalysisEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dairy sludge, which is produced as a result of the activated sludge process, used in the dairy processing industries for treating their effluents, is a low cost, locally available and relatively new adsorbent. It is being investigated for its capacity to remove some of the basic dyes such as aniline blue, crystal violet, malachite green, methylene blue, rhodamine-B, and safranine from aqueous solutions. The effects of various experimental parameters;; initial pH, dye concentration, sorbent dosage, ion strength, and contact time, were examined and optimal experimental conditions were decided. At initial basic pH of 10, all six of the dyes studied could be removed effectively and in a very short period of time of just 35 min. The isothermal data for adsorption followed the Freundlich and Langmuir models. The adsorption results in this study indicated that all the dyes studied in this work can be easily removed by the application of dairy sludge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207