Bibliographic record
Abstract
En s’appuyant sur un travail de terrain, cet article revient sur la question du pouvoir dans la société rifaine. L’émergence de l’économie du kif et de ses dérivés dans le Rif central a bouleversé les rapports socioéconomiques de cette société. Les valeurs du passé qui constituaient les fondements du pouvoir – l’honneur et la baraka comme capital symbolique qui se bâtissent autour de l’appropriation des terres et des femmes comme domaines de l’interdit – ont changé avec l’arrivée de l’économie du kif qui a permis l’ouverture du Rif vers le marché mondial. Cette ouverture n’est pas sans conséquence sur la structure sociale. Comment se présente le nouveau pouvoir dans le Rif actuel ? C’est la question que pose cet article en analysant la nouvelle hiérarchie sociale engendrée par la spécialisation dans la monoculture du kif et par l’apparition d’une classe, celle desbaznassas, qui cherche le contrôle du pouvoir dans une société où le capital symbolique a été remplacé par le capital matériel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".