Effect of golimumab and pamidronate on clinical efficacy and MRI inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis: a 48-week open randomized trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of golimumab (GLM) and pamidronate (PAM) on clinical efficacy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis (aSpA). METHOD: Patients who fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis Society (ASAS) criteria for aSpA and had active disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4] were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either GLM (50 mg) or PAM (60 mg) 4 weekly for 48 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed at intervals. Inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJs) on MRI was graded by the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system. RESULTS: Twenty patients were assigned to GLM and 10 to PAM (83% men; age 33.4 ± 10.9 years; disease duration 4.4 ± 3.4 years). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. At week 48, the proportions of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response were not significantly different between the GLM and PAM groups (65% vs. 56%; p = 0.69). Although there were no differences in BASDAI, spinal pain, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores between the two groups at week 48, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels were significantly lower in GLM-treated patients. The SPARCC scores of the spine and SIJs decreased significantly in GLM- but not in PAM-treated patients. The differences in SPARCC scores between the two groups at week 48 were statistically significant. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aSpA, the clinical response rate and improvement in pain and quality of life (QoL) were similar between GLM and PAM groups after 48 weeks. However, significant reduction in inflammatory markers and MRI inflammation was only observed with GLM treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".