MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1866250275 · doi:10.1109/icupc.1993.528455

Characterization of wireless indoor communication channel: Measurements and simulation

2002· article· en· W1866250275 on OpenAlexaff
Larbi Talbi, G.Y. Delisle, J. Ahern

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio propagationWirelessComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Transmission (telecommunications)SIGNAL (programming language)Field (mathematics)Electronic engineeringTime domainBounded functionFinite-difference time-domain methodRadio waveCommunications systemTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing interest in wireless indoor transmission systems and practical applications of local area networks have resulted in many investigations on the propagation of radio waves inside buildings. Most of the work done in this field aims at experimentally obtaining the statistical characteristics of the signal. The results presented in this paper give a better understanding of the propagation behavior of 37.2 GHz signals in different environments, making it possible to predict the time delay propagation from a knowledge of the building structure. Reflections from walls also play a major role in maintaining a high signal level within a closed environment. These results encourage the application of this type of radio system for the development of secure local communication systems in well defined environments. In fact, most common building materials used for external walls and room partitioning are very effective in screening the signal. From the foregoing results, a highly unified numerical procedure to treat the complex bounded electromagnetic field problems is needed. Furthermore, a solution of the 3-D mathematical model based on the time-domain integral equation of the electric field is proposed using the Boundary Element Method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and Analysis→French-language works237,207→