MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1866345109 · doi:10.1177/104515950101200306

Images, Transformative Learning and the Work of Soul

2001· article· en· W1866345109 on OpenAlexaff
John M. Dirkx

Bibliographic record

VenueAdult Learning · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningSoulWork (physics)PsychologySociologyPedagogyEpistemologyPhilosophyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While studying for his GED math test, Mitch became frustrated, threw his pencil, angrily pushed back his chair and remarked, can't get this stuff. I would rather be doing pottery. That would be something! In a course on adult learning, Marie discovered a reading on adult development theory that was helping her to understand what had been going on in her life. Finally, at the conclusion of a collaborative learning workshop, a middle-aged woman who had been with the community college for many years observed, Dr. Dirkx, I really like these ideas and can see how they would be useful to our learners. But, she continued with resignation in her voice, simply don't have the time or resources in our classes to do all these things you suggest. These scenarios demonstrate that subject matter can evoke deeply personal responses among adult learners, which manifests in distinctive emotional reactions. They illustrate that what adults learn is fundamentally grounded in the way they think about themselves and their worlds, opening possibilities for transformation and creating dramatic shifts in one's consciousness. As is often the case with transformation theory, educators interpret such statements literally and regard them as inherently rational, intentional and largely conscious. What if our thoughts about such reactions were regarded as fantasies or products of the learners' imaginations? Grounded in post-Jungian thought (Samuels, 1985) and the world of (Hillman, 1975, 2000; Moore, 1996), this article covers an approach to understanding and facilitating transformative learning in which emotional reactions to the text are regarded as imagistic manifestations of inner Hillman (2000) and Moore refer to the act of learning to work with images that populate thoughts, feelings and actions as soul work, which is critical to personal transformation (Dirkx, 2001). The Self and Other in Transformative Learning Post-Jungian scholars theorize humans to be constituted by a conscious waking self in dynamic interaction with a powerful unconscious. Although we usually identify with the waking self, the unconscious is very powerful in shaping consciousness. The unconscious is made up of clusters of psychic energy or that, at different times and situations, populate and shape the waking self (Watkins, 2000) and make up the total personality. People embody all these selves, their relationships with each and the relationships they each have with others in the outer world. Within any given situation, we unconsciously identify with, and unknowingly act for, one or more of these In the opening vignettes, learners expressed particular selves that reflect certain aspects of their unconscious with the outer conscious world. Some thing or other within the learning environment is evoking certain energies within their unconscious that express aspects of a particular unconscious self. This other can be frustration with a math problem, a vision of what it means to be a teacher or excitement in developmental stories. Depending on the situation in which they find themselves, a different sense of the other will be encountered, different energies constellated and different expressed. When doing pottery, Mitch may become a self-confident and contented artisan as opposed to an angry GRE taker. In her classroom, the aforementioned community college teacher might move fluidly and with grace among her academically underprepared students. Lastly, Marie's discovery of developmental theory might be at a loss how to share this growing excitement with her family. The learner's interaction with the text often leads to expression of one or more of these inner selves. When consciously realized, these expressions can lead to a more clear recognition and differentiation of the various that populate the learner's being. Vague emotions and feelings that seem to haunt the waking consciousness become more differentiated and fully elaborated. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.031
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdult LearningSame topicAdult and Continuing Education TopicsFrench-language works237,207