MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1866355330 · doi:10.3280/para2011-002012

Hans Jonas: The Function of Fear in Lucretius and Hobbes

2011· article· it· W1866355330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emidio Spinelli, Francesco Verde

Bibliographic record

VenuePARADIGMI · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questo contributo presenta un'importante sezione di una piů ampia e inedita serie di lezioni tenute da Hans Jonas durante il suo periodo di insegnamento in Canada (1950-1954). L'argomento principale riguarda il ruolo filosofico, psicologico e politico della paura, analizzato sia nella tradizione epicurea (in particolare in Lucrezio) sia in Hobbes. Oltre alla raffinata interpretazione delle caratteristiche basilari di quel complesso fenomeno, Jonas aggiunge alcune osservazioni critiche sull'attitudine unilaterale dei sistemi dualistici o materialistico-monistici di etŕ moderna e contemporanea, in linea con la sua nuova e originale proposta che si muove "verso una biologia filosofica".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePARADIGMISame topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207