MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A simple jaw splint for minimally displaced mandible fractures with undisplaced occlusion

2003· article· en· W186638325 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin J. A. Hoyt, Donald H. Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSplint (medicine)MedicineOcclusionOrthodonticsDentistrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lymphangioma is a rare benign proliferative lymphatic lesion that appears in chronic lymphedematous states in a variety of settings.Lymphangioma circumscriptum consists of clinically thin-walled, translucent vesicles appearing in groups most commonly located on the axilla, chest, mouth, and tongue.A 12-year-old male patient had been suffering from itching, pink-red colored, translucent vesicular lesions overlying the anterior axilla since birth.The lesions had slowly grown in size and number over the years.The patient had no history of trauma, or cellulites.The physical examination revealed clusters of pink-red colored vesicles, which released a clear exudate when punctured.The lesion was 50×120 mm in size.The lesion was totally excised and repaired with Z-plasty.Histopathological examination revealed slight epidermal acanthosis and enlarged lymph in the upper dermis, impinging directly onto the epidermis.These lymphatics were lined only by endothelium.The lower dermis and subcutis contained abnormally large muscle-coated vessels containing a proteinaceous fluid.Six months later, there was no recurrence and a cosmetically and functionally acceptable postoperative result was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic SurgerySame topicFacial Trauma and Fracture ManagementFrench-language works237,207