Morphology and facies architecture of a falling sea level strandplain, Umiujaq, Hudson Bay, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Coastal strandplain deposits near Umiujaq, eastern Hudson Bay, Canada, were formed under falling relative sea level conditions resulting from postglacial isostatic uplift. Ground‐probing radar profiles across the strandplain reveal a lower progradational unit (LPU) discordantly overlain by an upper progradational unit (UPU), which were correlated with stratigraphic sections exposed in incised valley walls. The discordance is a wave erosion surface (WES) that separates fine shoreface sands of the LPU from coarse‐sand and gravel of the UPU. Major basal downlap surfaces can be traced updip into marine terraces and define downstepping wedges. The downstepping is interpreted as representing ‘autocyclic’ morphological reconfiguration rather than a response to changes in the rate of sea level fall. The internal architecture is strongly dependent on the accommodation and thus on antecedent topography. A conceptual model for strandplain deposition under falling sea level incorporates a bipartite shallowing‐upward sandy succession when sufficient accommodation is available. Where accommodation space is limited, a sharp‐based bar‐and‐beach sandbody directly overlies muddy deeper water deposits and the WES resembles a regressive surface of erosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".