MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1866679484 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0232

Linking temporal changes in crayfish communities to environmental changes in boreal Shield lakes in south-central Ontario

2013· article· en· W1866679484 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Brie A. Edwards, Donald A. Jackson, Keith M. Somers

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Environment
KeywordsCrayfishBiotaAbiotic componentEcologyEcosystemEnvironmental scienceAquatic ecosystemFood webEnvironmental changeAbundance (ecology)Relative species abundanceBiologyClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When aquatic ecosystems are among those most intensely affected by local and regional environmental change, it is crucial that stressors are identified to set priorities for future research and mitigation. Studies relating changes in important or sensitive assemblages to environmental changes provide a means to quantify potential stress on aquatic biota. Crayfish are ideal taxa for this type of study because they influence ecosystem structure and function and are sensitive to biotic and abiotic changes. We used historical and contemporary crayfish abundance and select environmental data for 100 inland lakes in central Ontario, to identify factors that are correlated with community membership and species distributions at each time and to elucidate environmental factors that can be directly linked to changes in relative abundance between the two time periods. Our results show that declines in lake calcium, invasions of warm-water centrarchids, and anthropogenic shoreline development have increased in their relative influence over time. These stressors may be affecting other freshwater biota directly, or indirectly through food web changes or altered abiotic interactions among the environmental changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207