MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1866943087

The geographic pipeline to Rural Family Medicine at Memorial University

2014· article· pt· W1866943087 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rourke james Parsons, wanda Hippe, Janell

Bibliographic record

VenueANAIS DO CONGRESSO SUL-BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA DE FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADE · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationRural areaGeographyRural communityCensusSocioeconomicsMedicineSociologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducao: The Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador has a significant rural population, with 52% of the population living in communities of under 10,000 people and an additional 10% in communities of between 10,000 and 25,000 people. Producing family doctors to work in these communities is an important task of the medical school at Memorial University  of Newfoundland. Objetivos: Memorial University’s “pipeline” approach to producing rural family doctors involves recruiting rural students and providing rural placements. This study measures and reports on Memorial’s success in both areas. Metodologia ou Descricao da Experiencia: This study uses administrative data for MUNMED graduating classes 2011 and 2012 to describe backgrounds and educational placements of these students. This study also reports on practice locations of all MUNMED graduates practicing family medicine in Newfoundland and Labrador. StatsCan population data was used to classify locations as follows: small rural community (<10,000 population); small rural city (10,000-24,999 population); medium city (24,999-99,999 population), large city (100,00-499,999 population), very large city (500,000-999,999 population) and metropolis (over 1,000,000 population). SPSS was used to calculate frequencies and ArcGIS was used to map results. Resultados: Of 120 students who graduated in 2011 and 2012, 32% had rural backgrounds. For graduating classes 2011-2012, 65% of Year 1 Community Health placement weeks took place in small rural communities and 19% took place in small rural cities; 41% of Year 2 FM Community placement weeks took place in small rural communities and 14% took place in small rural cities; 88% of Year 3 FM placement weeks took place in small rural communities and 6% took place in small rural cities. Of 297 MUNMED graduates currently practicing family medicine in Newfoundland and Labrador, 64 (22%) are practicing in small rural cities and 44 (15%) are practicing in small rural communities of under 10,000. Conclusao ou Hipoteses: External data confirms our conclusion that Memorial’s pipeline to rural family practice is successful: In 2010, Memorial received the Keith award for having the highest percentage of FM graduates (52%) working in rural practice 10 years after graduation. In 2013, Memorial received the Keith award again, having 44% of FM graduates in rural practice 10 years after graduation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANAIS DO CONGRESSO SUL-BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA DE FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADESame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207