Le musée de l’Institut canadien de Montréal (1852-1882), un projet inachevé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Instauré en 1852, le projet de musée de l’institut canadien de Montréal bénéficie de présents (moulages de sculptures) faits par les musées impériaux de France et le prince Napoléon (estampes), ainsi que de spécimens de sciences naturelles venus du Canada et de pays étrangers. Ajoutons des pièces de numismatique et des souvenirs historiques et le profil hétéroclite de cette collection se dessine. Son objectif : servir « les idées de progrès et de liberté » qui étaient au cœur de la mission de l’institut canadien. L’histoire de ce musée (1852-1882) est relatée à travers les efforts et la pensée des figures de deux de ses défenseurs les plus énergiques : Joseph-Guillaume Barthe et Gonzalve Doutre. elle est présentée comme emblématique de la pratique de la muséologie au Québec au XIXe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".