Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un article stimulant, Roberte Hamayon explorait les liens entre tradition chamanique et tradition épique chez les Bouriates de Sibérie. Dans le présent article, j’examine les dimensions chamanique et épique des récits inuit, et en particulier de l’illustreunikaaqtuaqde Kiviuq. Les récits qui mettent en scène Kiviuq présentent tous les traits d’une épopée émergente centrée sur un héros chamanique. L’article porte une attention particulière à la dialectique complexe qui existe entre le comportement social et non social du héros. La position de Kiviuq paraît ambiguë, puisque ses aventures peuvent se dénouer aussi bien sur son aliénation complète de la société que sur son retour à ses femmes. Il ne met pas ses aptitudes chamaniques au service de la communauté mais à celui de sa survie lorsqu’il rencontre de dangereux êtres non humains. Ainsi Kiviuq n’est-il pas un héros de service mais un héros de la survie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".