MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shallow Talk about Information Security in the Corporate Office

2013· article· en· W1868045849 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xia Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityInformation securityInformation security managementKey (lock)CopyingConfidentialityCertified Information Security ManagerComputer scienceInformation protection policyInternet privacyHackerSecurity serviceBusinessSecurity information and event managementPersonally identifiable informationCloud computing securityNetwork security policyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information security refers to the information network hardware, software and its system of data protection, not subject to destroyed, changed or leaked by accidental or malicious reasons. System can be running continuously、reliably and normally. Information services can’t be interrupted. The confidentiality, authenticity, integrity, unauthorized copying and its parasitic system security of the information is ensured. Information security in the Corporate Office is the key of enterprise modern office. Once be neglected, it is easy to bring a series of negative impacts. In this paper, the information security in enterprises office is to be discussed briefly. Key words: Information; Security; Threats; Strategy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207