Alexitimia y estrés laboral en los profesionales de la Enfermería hospitalaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo fue establecer la relacion entre la alexitimia y el estres laboral en los de Enfermeria. Se estudio una muestra de 240 Diplomados en Enfermeria (216 mujeres y 24 hombres) que desarrollaban su labor en el medio hospitalario. Los sujetos respondieron a un cuestionario anonimo que contenia, ademas de ciertas variables sociodemograficas, como el genero, la edad y los anos de experiencia laboral, la Escala de Estres para Enfermeria (NSS) y la Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20). Se obtuvieron coeficientes de correlacion positivos y significativos entre las puntuaciones totales de la NSS y la TAS-20 y entre la TAS-20 y los factores de la NSS denominados relaciones profesionales y intragrupal. Asimismo, se encontro una moderada correlacion negativa, aunque significativa, entre las puntuaciones de la NSS y los anos de experiencia laboral. Los resultados confirman la asociacion entre las caracteristicas alexitimicas y la aparicion de estres laboral en el profesional de Enfermeria, especialmente en aquellos aspectos que comportan el trabajo en equipo y la comunicacion con los companeros.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".