Indici e controindici: la polemica di Pier Paolo Vergerio contro la censura ecclesiastica
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In quest'articolo si esaminano alcuni dei rilievi polemici che Pier Paolo Vergerio il giovane inserì nei numerosi libelli scritti contro il papato e la Chiesa cattolica. Gli interventi vergeriani qui studiati riguardano gli Indices librorum prohibitorum, segnatamente quello veneziano del 1549, con alcuni rimandi anche a quello tridentino del 1564. L'articolo si sofferma in particolare sulla polemica che Vergerio ingaggiò contro le proibizioni di alcune opere di Dante (De monarchia), Petrarca e Boccaccio. In nota si pubblica anche una pressoché sconosciuta traduzione latina (curata da Vergerio) del sonetto petrarchesco Fontana di dolore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it