MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1869929938 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n19p15

Invariant Transformation of Human Time Representations at the Stage of Turning Events

2015· article· en· W1869929938 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ирина Александровна Ральникова, Елена Александровна Ипполитова, Olga Gurova, Ludmila Denisovna Demina, Maksim Aleksandrovich Kostenko

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSocioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Turning pointContext (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)PsychologySocial psychologyMathematicsComputer scienceHistoryPeriod (music)PhilosophyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is devoted to the actual problem of studying the human representations of the lifetimes at the stage of turning events. Such events as: loss of a marriage partner, diseases associated with malignant neoplasm, deprivation of liberty, disability caused by an injury, and reproductive disorders acted as the turning events. The turning events violate the human self-organization considered as an open psychological system, create a certain bifurcation point for the human being, set the context of uncertainty and stability loss, and thereby determine the potential opportunity of finding new grounds to recover a dynamic equilibrium. The revealed invariant transformations of time representations in the era of reversal of life-violation of time integrity, narrowing of transspective review of life path, actualization of orientation to the past, positive reassessment of the past, loss of value of the present and future time, target and event uncertainty of life prospects, and dispersion of personal responsibility for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicSocioeconomic and Demographic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207