MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W187005575

Climate Change and Place Roundtable Discussion

2008· article· en· W187005575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Steffen, Raymond J. Cole, Kevin Aia Burke, Emanuel Carter, Stephen Luoni, Brian Stone, Frances Halsband, Kristina E. Hill, Diane M. Asla Dale, Fritz Steiner, Kristie Golden, Megan M. Susman, John V. Thomas, Steve McDowell, Stephen Antupit

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeNothingEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate Change and Place Roundtable Discussion Climate change has already started to transform the physi- cal, ecological, and social configuration of places around the world. The meanings and experiences of place are also certain to change significantly. Given the acceleration of this issue in our day-to-day practices, Places convened a “virtual” roundtable to explore the changing reciprocity of climate and place from different disciplinary perspectives. In solicit- ing contributions from leading thinkers on this subject, we especially seek to understand how the design of places might help communities reduce and adapt to the predicted impacts of climate change. We offer the following comments as part of our continuing analysis of the importance of place. —The Editors Ecological Design and the Role of Nature Think about where you’re sitting. How would it be dif- ferent if the sea were twenty meters higher? If rainfall dropped to a tenth of what’s normal? If rainfall doubled? If the summer started in the spring and lasted through the autumn? Think about what runaway climate change would mean where you live. Imagine your life in a carbon-neutral society. Imagine burning no fossil fuels, and getting your electricity from wind, solar, hydro, and wave energy. Imagine living in a superinsulated house in a walkable community. Imagine eating less meat and more locally grown vegetables. Imagine throwing nothing away, but recycling everything. Imagine failure, and imagine success. And imagine them right where you are now. Alex Steffen World Changing Seattle, WA Climate change is global in scale and consequence, and any solution will require sustained international political cooperation. Climate change will influence every human endeavor, and solutions will also require individual engage- ment and action played out at a local scale. Mitigation strategies to temper the extent of future climate change and adaptation strategies to address changes already initiated will profoundly influence where, what, and how we build. Climate change has intensified political and public interest in environmental performance targets. “Net-zero- energy” and “carbon-neutral” buildings require radical reductions in energy demand, the use of passive strategies, and greater deployment of onsite renewable energy collec- tion—all of which are geographic and climate dependent. Climate change has also caused a reevaluation of more fundamental approaches to community and building design and their relationship to natural systems. Beyond the current emphasis on greater energy self-reliance at the individual building level, there are opportunities for creative synergies with adjacent buildings and surrounding natural systems. Moreover, after a managed restoration of degraded ecosystems, permitting natural systems freedom to mature toward greater diversity and resilience according to the constraints and opportunities afforded by place is the basis of regenerative design. Within this local context, regenerative design seeks the considered co-evolution of human and natural systems, and the act of building initiates this process. A fully matured global information system will likely enable participation in a global culture in tandem with this re-establishment of regional identity and place-specific building practices. Raymond J. Cole, Ph.D. Professor and Director, School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. Climate change challenges the human spirit. How do we act in a world in which our very presence has created threats to our existence and that of all species? Can we summon the will to change our behavior? Perhaps most importantly, do we possess the wisdom to know what to do? Ecology tells us that everything is connected. Ecological design renders these connections visible, reminding us of our rightful place in kinship with the natural world. Eco- logical designers are mindful of the impacts of our designs, looking both upstream and downstream, and consider- ing effects over time. Ecological designers also take their cues from nature, creating artifacts and places powered by the sun, composed of safe and healthy materials in closed cycles, celebrating what we learn from nature by mirroring its wondrous diversity. Climate Change Roundtable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.246
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207