MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1870374105 · doi:10.4271/2008-01-0212

Microstructure Development in a Magnesium Alloy Tube during Ring Hoop Tension Testing and Warm Gas Forming

2008· article· en· W1870374105 on OpenAlexaff
Liudi Jiang, John J. Jonas, K. P. Boyle, P. Martin, Raj Kumar Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostructureTube (container)Materials scienceTension (geology)AlloyMagnesium alloyMetallurgyMagnesiumRing (chemistry)Composite materialUltimate tensile strengthChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of microstructure in a Mg 3.4%AI-0.16%Zn-0.33%Mn alloy tube was studied during deformation by ring hoop tension testing (RHTT). When the tests were carried out at moderate temperatures and relatively high strain rates, the accompanying c-axis strains were mainly accommodated by twin formation. At temperatures above 200°C and the lowest strain rate (0.001s-1), the formation of voids in the partially dynamically recrystallized regions caused premature fracture. The microstructural development in hot gasformed samples was similar to that observed during RHTT testing. These results indicate that RHTT testing is an effective way of studying the deformation behavior of Mg alloys during tube gas forming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE International Journal of Materials and ManufacturingSame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207