MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1870752685 · doi:10.1109/mppoi.1996.559068

Optically interconnected electronics-challenges and choices

2002· article· en· W1870752685 on OpenAlex
F. A. P. Tooley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNortel (Canada)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransceiverComputer scienceOptical fiberRibbonOptical cross-connectElectronicsElectronic engineeringOptical performance monitoringFree spacePower consumptionFiber optic splitterParallel optical interfaceOptical switchSpace (punctuation)Free-space optical communicationMultiwavelength optical networkingPower (physics)Electrical engineeringTelecommunicationsOptical communicationOpticsEngineeringWavelength-division multiplexingMaterials sciencePhysicsFiber optic sensorWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The challenges facing the use of optical interconnects to provide high capacity links is reviewed. The power consumption of optical and electrical links are compared. The performance of fiber ribbon optical data links is described. It is argued that free-space digital optics may be used to provide higher capacity. The required and achieved performance of transceivers and the optics and mechanics used for free-space digital optical systems is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207