MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1871005154 · doi:10.1080/08263663.2014.959400

The dilemma of nationalism: migrant labour, economic crisis, and the politics of belonging in the Cayman Islands

2013· article· fr· W1871005154 on OpenAlexaff
Sean E. Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPopulationFinancial crisisProsperityUnemploymentNationalismPoliticsRecessionDilemmaCapitalismCapital (architecture)Development economicsPolitical economyPolitical scienceEconomicsEconomySociologyEconomic growthGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between the 1970s and 1990s, the Cayman Islands underwent a massive socio-economic transformation. In becoming one of the world’s largest financial centers, its gross national product increased a thousand-fold, and its population multiplied five times. The Caymanian story of “economic success” has been founded on foreign capital and foreign workers. According to local legal, historical, and media discourses, the strict regulation of migrant workers’ rights to permanent residence and citizenship has been crucial to this prosperity. This paper analyzes shifts in discourses on the Caymanian nation triggered by the impact of the 2008 global economic crisis. Amidst a massive reduction in the migrant population, rising levels of violent crime and unemployment among locals, and staggering levels of government debt – in short, one of the longest recessions of any country in the world – the substantive privileges of Caymanian citizenship have come to appear increasingly tenuous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbesSame topicCaribbean history, culture, and politicsFrench-language works237,207