MODEL PENGEMBANGAN TATA RUANG KAWASAN OBJEK WISATA AIR STUDI KASUS: OBJEK WISATA AIR JOLOTUNDO, KLATEN (Models of Land Use Development in Water Tourism Area Case Study: Jolotundo Water Recreation, Klaten)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purposc of this research is to develop tourism potential nnd environnrcnt consen'atiort of' Jolotundo tourisnt desfinatictn, Klaten Municipality, so it can grow antl develop o.t a competitit,c tourisnt destirtcrtiort with strategic role in Klaten tourism development.Tlrc problent of Jolotundo tourism elestirrutiort especiallv related to the lack of sustainable resources use, dishannonv land use planning hetwcert recreatiottal ond preservation functiort, And the lack of attraction diverstficatiort.The nrctltod of this research is qualitative approach with naturalistic paradigm, u'hich are integrated lourism clevelopntent, appropriate supply and deman.d,preseruatiort-corrsen,ation and ecotouri.snr.The fesult of tltis research reveals tlrc nndel of Jolotundo planning which has to refer to integratiort principal betweett presen'atiort, consentatiotr and recreational function, antl to built linkage witlt sprittg orea.In the next developnrcnt, Jolotundo planning will involr)e v)eter elenrcnt and comrrtunity participatio,t.Kevv'ttrd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it