MODEL PENGEMBANGAN TATA RUANG KAWASAN OBJEK WISATA AIR STUDI KASUS: OBJEK WISATA AIR JOLOTUNDO, KLATEN (Models of Land Use Development in Water Tourism Area Case Study: Jolotundo Water Recreation, Klaten)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan potensi kepariwisataan dan konservasi lingkungan di Objek Wisata Jolotundo, Kabupaten Klaten, sehingga dapat tumbuh dan berkembang sebagai kawasan tujuan wisata yang kompetitif dan mempunyai peran strategis dalam pengembangan kepariwisataan di Klaten. Permasalahan yang ada di Objek Wisata Jolotundo adalah karena belum maksimalnya penggunaan sumber daya yang berkelanjutan, belum adanya penataan ruang yang harmonis antara fungsi rekreasi dan fungsi preservasi lingkungan, serta kurangnya diversifikasi atraksi. Metode yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan paradigma naturalistik. Sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan perencanaan pariwisata terpadu (integrated tourism development), keterpaduan supply dan demand pariwisata, preservasi konservasi, dan ekowisata. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ini, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perancangan Kawasan Jolotundo harus mengacu pada prinsip integrasi antara fungsi preservasi dengan fungsi rekreasi. dan menciptakan linkage dengan lokasi pemandian. Dalam perkembangan selanjutnya, konsep perancangan Kawasan Jolotundo diharapkan dapat melibatkan elemen air dan partisipasi masyarakat. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to develop tourism potential and environment conservation of Jolotundo tourism destination, Klaten Municipality, so it can grow and develop as a competitive tourism destination with strategic role in Klaten tourism development. The problem of Jolotundo tourism destination especially related to the lack of sustainable resources use, disharmony land use planning between recreational and preservation function, and the lack of attraction diversification. The method of this research is qualitative approach with naturalistic paradigm, which are integrated tourism development, appropriate supply and demand, preservation- conservation and ecotourism. The result of this research reveals the model of Jolotundo planning which has to refer to integration principal between preservation, conservation and recreational function, and to built linkage with spring area. In the next development, Jolotundo planning will involve water element and community participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".