MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1872205520 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150400

Association of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Radical Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy

2015· article· en· W1872205520 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Gladwish, Michael Milosevic, Anthony Fyles, Jason Xie, Jaydeep Halankar, Ur Metser, Haiyan Jiang, Nathan Becker, Wilfred Levin, L. Manchul, Warren D. Foltz, Kathy Han

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerEffective diffusion coefficientMagnetic resonance imagingRadiation therapyProportional hazards modelNuclear medicineStage (stratigraphy)Hazard ratioCancerRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineRadiologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To investigate whether volumetrically derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from pretreatment diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is associated with disease recurrence in women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ethics board-approved, retrospective study was conducted in 85 women with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with chemo- and radiation therapy in 2009-2013. All patients underwent MR imaging for staging, including T2-weighted and DW MR imaging series, by using a 1.5- or 3.0-T imager. The mean, median, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentile ADCs (ADCmean, ADC50, ADC75, ADC90, and ADC95, respectively) of all voxels that comprised each tumor were extracted and normalized to the mean urine ADC (nADCmean, nADC50, nADC75, nADC90, and nADC95, respectively) to reduce variability. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of ADC parameters and relevant clinical variables with DFS. RESULTS: Of the 85 women included, 62 were free of disease at last follow-up. Median follow-up was 37 months (range, 5-68 months). Significant variables at univariable analysis included T2-weighted derived tumor diameter, para-aortic nodal involvement, advanced stage, ADC90 and ADC95, nADC75, nADC90, and nADC95. Normalized parameters were more highly associated (hazard ratio per 0.01 increase in normalized ADC, 0.91-0.94; P < .04). Because nADC75, nADC90, and nADC95 were highly correlated, only nADC95 (which had the lowest P value) was included in multivariable analysis. At multivariable analysis, absolute and normalized ADC95 remained associated with DFS (hazard ratio, 0.90-0.98; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The volumetric ADC95 may be a useful imaging metric to predict treatment failure in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemo- and radiation therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207