Portrait de Réjean Ducharme en messie des lettres québécoises 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une étude de la réception des oeuvres de Réjean Ducharme dans le contexte de la décennie 1960, époque où prévaut un imaginaire du temps qui appelle le changement à s’incarner, à prendre corps et visage humains. Ce désir d’emblématisation se traduit, dans le domaine des lettres québécoises, par l’attente du « grand écrivain » qui officialiserait la réussite du projet de modernisation propre à la Révolution tranquille. L’accueil réservé aux premières oeuvres de Ducharme, qui a donné lieu à ce que l’on appelle désormais « l’affaire Ducharme », a été directement influencé par ce climat de messianisme littéraire, et plus particulièrement par l’écart mesurable entre le désir de faire de l’auteur un emblème du renouveau national et la volonté de l’auteur de se retirer de la sphère publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".