MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Migraciones transnacionales y uso de las tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC)

2015· article· es· W1873084242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNómadas Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedia and Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperMainstreamCitizen journalismParticipatory cultureInformation and Communications TechnologyThe InternetNew mediaGlobePolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Social communicationMedia studiesSociologyHumanitiesGeographyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ICT (Information Technologies and Communication) revolution that took place in the last quarter century has produced changes in various social practices, including communications. The Internet has become a new tool and space for the media. During the nineties, the main newspapers had presence on the World Wide Web. This ICT driven transformation has reached other smaller publications such as immigrant communities’ newspapers. Along with radio programs, magazines and some television programs, those newspapers operate within social groups as alternative media to the mainstream media, and they also provide community participation and identity construction spaces. From the case study, this paper analyzes the passage of newspapers published by Andean migrant groups in Argentina towards the Facebook social networking service. This paper questions about the type of communication (horizontal, participatory) of these new formats and about their potential for becoming tools that foster a beneficial communication channel for these groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it