Reflexiones sobre los regímenes especiales en Derecho internacional privado sucesorio según el Reglamento europeo 650/2012 de 4 de julio de 2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: La oposicion tradicional entre el sistema escisionista y el sistema unitario de ley aplicable a la sucesion encuentra un factor conciliador en el respeto de las “disposiciones especiales” de la lex rei sitae sobre determinados bienes de la herencia, aplicables con independencia de la norma de conflicto. Lo que se pretende es respetar un minimo normativo de la ley del Estado de situacion de los bienes en contra de la amenaza que representa la competencia general de una lex successionis extranjera. Este bloque normativo irreductible se presenta como un puente que une las dos soluciones extremas en una posicion intermedia, donde no se contempla la escision en su significado clasico derivado de la naturaleza mueble o inmueble de los bienes (escision territorial general), pero donde se rompe el principio de la unidad sucesoria en razon de determinadas consideraciones sustanciales derivadas de la destinacion economica, familiar o social de los bienes, por medio de una conexion especial a la lex situs . Esta es la posicion adoptada por el articulo 30 del Reglamento europeo sobre sucesiones de 4 de julio de 2012. Palabras clave: sucesion internacional, Reglamento europeo sobre sucesiones, normas de policia, articulo 30, regimenes sucesorios especiales, disposiciones especiales, sucesion anomala, atribucion preferente, lex rei sitae , destinacion economica, familiar o social, escision, unidad, explotacion agraria, vivienda familiar, troncalidad. Abstract: The traditional conflict between the scission and the unitary system of the law applicable to succession finds a conciliatory factor in the observation of the “special provisions” of the lex rei sitae over some particular assets of the estate notwithstanding the conflict rule. The intention is to preserve a minimal content of the State’s law where certain assets are located against the threat that a foreign lex successionis brings about. This uncompromising set of rules presents itself as a bridge to close the gap between these two extreme solutions. It does not contemplate the classic meaning of scission based on the movable or immovable nature of the property (territorial scission), but it breaks nonetheless the principle of unity, in favor of certain substantial considerations derived from the economic, family or social function of some specific assets, by means of a special connection to the lex situs . This is the position stated by Article 30 of the European Regulation on succession matters adopted on July 4th, 2012. Keywords: international succession, European Succession Regulation, mandatory rules, article 30, particular inheritance regimes, special provisions, special succession, preferential attribution, lex rei sitae , economic, family or social considerations, scission, unity, agricultural exploitation, family home, troncalidad .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".