MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1873705278 · doi:10.1109/icc.1996.541375

Migrating to ATM in the local area

2002· article· en· W1873705278 on OpenAlexaff
V.J. Friesen, J.W. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkLocal area networkComputer scienceEthernetAsynchronous Transfer ModeDistributed-queue dual-busATM adaptation layerThroughputBackbone networkLAN switchingPopularityOperating systemBurst switchingTransmission delayNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local area networking has been undergoing significant changes as multimedia applications gain popularity and client-server data traffic increases. It is unclear to what degree the existing shared-medium LAN technology is capable of meeting the changing demands. ATM is an attractive alternative because it is able to support a higher total throughput than shared-medium networks. The objective of this study is to evaluate alternative strategies for migrating towards an ATM switched internetwork, where the backbone network is comprised of ATM switching, while switching hubs serve as access points for the server and client machines. We concentrate on the local access portion of the migration problem. The network components considered are Ethernet at 10 Mb/s and 100 Mb/s, switching hubs, and ATM-equipped end devices. Simulation results for the performance of both data and realtime traffic are presented, and other related issues are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207