The Sense of Isolation in Arthur Miller’s All My Sons: A Postmodernist Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Miller’s All my Sons no doubt can be considered an outstanding masterpiece which shows not only the nature of the Second World War but also the nature and the multifaceted features of business targeted and politicized wars which do not seem to come to a stoppage. Lots of researchers have worked on this play, but this study aims at having a postmodern look at All my Sons. It makes an attempt to break the shackles of the so-called logical reasoning and calculations of modernism and bring the issue in a free and honest bedrock. It tries to give a postmodern disclosure to the isolation and alienation of man, which have been inherited from the calculating modern world of enlightenment and rationalism. Key words: Arthur Miller; Isolation; Postmodern; Research; AlienationResume: Il n’y a aucun doute qu’on peut considerer que “Tous mes Fils” de Miller un chef-d'œuvre remarquable(qui montre non seulement la nature de la Seconde guerre mondiale, mais aussi la nature et les caracteristique a facettes multiples d'affaire qui ont ete cibles et politisees de guerres qui ne semblent pas venir a une interruption. Beaucoup de chercheurs a travaille sur ce sujet, mais cette etude vise a avoir un regard de post-moderne dans “Tous mes Fils”. Il fait une tentative de casser les chaines du raisonnement logique pretendu et des calculs de modernisme et apporte la question dans un socle rocheux libre et honnete. Il essaye de donner une revelation post-moderne a l'isolement et a l'alienation d'homme, qui a ete herite du monde moderne prevoyant d'eclaircissement et le rationalisme.Mots-cles: Arthur Miller; Isolement; Post-moderne; Recherche; Alienation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".