<i>Stabat Venus dolorosa</i> nell’<i>Adone</i> di Marino
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il presente studio intende verificare e sviluppare una linea interpretativa dell’Adone tracciata a più riprese da Francesco Guardiani (specialmente: La meravigliosa retorica 52–56; “I trastulli” 313; “A Christological Metamorphosis” 187–94) e già rilevata da P. Pozzi nel suo fondamentale commento (in Marino, L’Adone, vol. 2, 63): si tratta di quel costante innesto, nella figura e nella vicenda di Adone, di elementi appartenenti alla storia sacra e, specificamente, a Cristo e alla sua Passione. Si è parlato e si continua a parlare, a tale proposito, di “neopaganesimo” (Frare), il che indica quanto sia cruciale interrogarsi sugli scopi, se mai Marino ne avesse, e sugli esiti di questo giocare col fuoco della fede e del dogma in un’epoca poco incline al compromesso. In questo percorso, l’Adone sarà letto tenendo presenti, in particolare, la Lira e le Dicerie Sacre, due opere che, per quanto attiene ai carmi dedicati alla Passione, si illuminano a vicenda anche in forza della cronologia (Lira III e Dicerie, infatti, escono nel 1614): per parafrasare, grazie alla fecondissima produzione del Nostro, il motto dell’esegesi omerica di Aristarco, si proverà dunque a “spiegare Marino con Marino”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".