Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONCLUSION: Qu’il s’agisse de la mise en valeur du patrimoine, du soutien aux createurs et aux organismes culturels, de l’acces et de la participation des citoyens ou de la concertation et du partenariat, les objectifs de la Ville de Trois-Rivieres sont clairs : faire des arts et de la culture une des pieces maitresses de son developpement global. En s’engageant rapidement dans le processus d’harmonisation des anciennes politiques culturelles, Trois-Rivieres a encore une fois demontre son dynamisme et sa volonte de ne pas laisser le vide s’installer dans ce qui constitue les fondements memes des actions culturelles de la cite et, ce faisant, Trois-Rivieres s’assure de conserver sa place parmi les capitales culturelles au Quebec. La Politique culturelle de la Ville de Trois-Rivieres appartient maintenant aux citoyens, aux createurs et aux intervenants culturels. Elle guidera nos actions au cours des prochaines annees, nous rappelant constamment que Trois-Rivieres est une ville d’histoire et de culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".