Regards croisés sur le colonialisme et le post colonialisme en Afrique subsaharienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article s’intéresse à l’influence de la période coloniale sur les développements politiques postcoloniaux. Dans un premier temps, il met en évidence la rupture que constitua l’introduction de l’économie politique coloniale. Dans un second temps, il retrace la façon avec laquelle s’est constitué progressivement, entre le XVIe et le XXe siècle, l’Empire puis la République coloniale française en Afrique. La France, pays symbole du triomphe du droit républicain, favorisera une dualité juridique et morale, privilégiant un état de non-droit et d’exception permanent au sein de ses colonies. En tant que pays des droits de l’homme, l’entreprise de « civilisation » des peuples « sauvages » sera légitimée, justifiant l’usage systématique de la violence politique et de la coercition. Enfin, l’article considère l’impact de la colonisation sur les développements politiques ultérieurs, montrant comment, loin de faire table rase d’un passé traumatique, de nombreux dirigeants postcoloniaux s’inspireront de la domination coloniale afin de consolider leurs propres pouvoirs personnels et de favoriser la persistance d’États faibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".