MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1875055813 · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1623724

Subklinische alveoläre Echinokokkose bei einem Hund mit anfänglicher Symptomatik einer Leptospireninfektion

2013· article· de· W1875055813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Roehrig, Ludwig E. Hoelzle, W. Amselgruber, Martin Šteffl

Bibliographic record

VenueTierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K Kleintiere / Heimtiere · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic infections in humans and animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Ein dreieinhalbjähriger Labrador-Retriever-Rüde zeigte vor Erstvorstellung eine kurze Krankheitsphase mit Erbrechen, Apathie und Fieber. Bei der Ultraschalluntersuchung des Abdomens konnten am linken und rechten Leberlappen große, rundliche hyperechogene Massen dargestellt werden. Die zytologische und die bakteriologische Untersuchung ergaben eine neutrophile Hepatitis ohne spezifischen Erregernachweis. Während der Behandlung mit Doxycyclin ließ sich in gepaarten Serumproben ein vierfacher Abfall der komplementbindenden Antikörper gegen Leptospira (L.) icterohaemorrhagiae und L. sejroe nachweisen. Der Patient blieb klinisch und labordiagnostisch bis zur Probelaparotomie unauffällig. Sonographisch wurde jedoch ein Fortschreiten der hepatischen Läsionen mit jetzt kavernösen Hohlräumen festgestellt. Die Probelaparotomie zeigte umfangreiche hepatische Umfangsvermehrungen und der Hund wurde euthanasiert. Die histopathologische Untersuchung ergab multiple konfluierende Granulome der Leber mit Nachweis parasitärer Strukturen, deren Morphologie mit dem Finnenstadium von Echinococcus (E.) multilocularis vereinbar war.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K Kleintiere / HeimtiereSame topicParasitic infections in humans and animalsFrench-language works237,207