Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis un siècle et demi, plusieurs historiens et généalogistes ont traité de l’immigration au Canada sous le régime français. Or, pour la plupart, ils se sont préoccupés d’une fraction seulement de l’immigration totale, celle correspondant aux individus qui ont fait souche au pays, constituant les racines de ce qui allait devenir la population canadienne. Dans cet article, on examine la littérature sur le sujet, tout en introduisant les concepts nouveaux d’immigration fondatrice et d’immigration observée. Enfin, on présente de nouvelles estimations de l’immigration observée et de la migration nette pour la période 1666-1760. On montre que l’immigration totale, soit l’immigration brute, a été d’au moins quelque 30 000 Français entre 1608 et 1760. Cette valeur excède de beaucoup l’estimation consacrée par l’historiographie qui fixait à quelque 10 000 le nombre d’immigrants de cette période.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".