MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1875930015 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.031302

Observation of Doppler broadening in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math>-delayed proton-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math>decay

2015· article· lv· W1875930015 on OpenAlexaff
Sanford Schwartz, C. Wrede, M. B. Bennett, S. N. Liddick, D. Pérez–Loureiro, A. Bowe, A. A. Chen, K. A. Chipps, Natalie Cooper, D. Irvine, E. McNeice, F. Montes, F. Naqvi, R. Ortez, S. D. Pain, J. Pereira, C. J. Prokop, J. Quaglia, S. J. Quinn, J. Sakstrup, Marco D. Santia, Safwan Shanab, A. Simon, A. Spyrou, E. Thiagalingam

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsProtonPhysicsDoppler broadeningNucleonGamma rayEnergy (signal processing)RecoilAtomic physicsNuclear physicsSpectral lineQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Doppler broadening of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray peaks due to nuclear recoil from $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed nucleon emission can be used to measure the energies of the nucleons. This method has never been tested using $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed proton emission or applied to a recoil heavier than $A=10$.Purpose: To test and apply this Doppler broadening method using $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray peaks from the $^{26}\mathrm{P}(\ensuremath{\beta}p\ensuremath{\gamma})^{25}\mathrm{Al}$ decay sequence.Methods: A fast beam of $^{26}\mathrm{P}$ was implanted into a planar Ge detector, which was used as a $^{26}\mathrm{P} \ensuremath{\beta}$-decay trigger. The SeGA array of high-purity Ge detectors was used to detect $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays from the $^{26}\mathrm{P}(\ensuremath{\beta}p\ensuremath{\gamma})^{25}\mathrm{Al}$ decay sequence.Results: Radiative Doppler broadening in $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed proton-$\ensuremath{\gamma}$ decay was observed for the first time. The Doppler broadening analysis method was verified using the 1613-keV $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray line for which the proton energies were previously known. The 1776-keV $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ ray de-exciting the 2720 keV $^{25}\mathrm{Al}$ level was observed in $^{26}\mathrm{P}(\ensuremath{\beta}p\ensuremath{\gamma})^{25}\mathrm{Al}$ decay for the first time and used to determine that the center-of-mass energy of the proton emission feeding the 2720-keV level is $5.1\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}1.0$ (stat.) $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}0.6$ (syst.) MeV, corresponding to a $^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ excitation energy of $13.3\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}1.0$ (stat.) $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}0.6$ (syst.) MeV for the proton-emitting level.Conclusions: The Doppler broadening method has been demonstrated to provide practical measurements of the energies for $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed nucleon emissions populating excited states of nuclear recoils at least as heavy as $A=25$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207