MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1876059199 · doi:10.1109/igarss.1999.774534

The influence of sensor overpass time on passive microwave derived snow water equivalent measurements

2003· article· en· W1876059199 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Derksen, E. LeDrew

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowpackSnowBrightness temperatureRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceWater equivalentMicrowaveEmissivityMeteorologyGeographyPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive microwave derived retrieval of terrestrial snow water equivalent (SWE) is strongly influenced by snowpack wetness. The presence of water in the crystal matrix increases the microwave emissivity, destroying the between channel brightness temperature gradient used to make quantitative estimates of SWE. In order to obtain the most accurate SWE imagery, overpass times from orbiting sensors such as the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) can be chosen so that the diurnally coldest and driest snowpack is being monitored. The authors evaluate the ro/spl circ/le of sensor overpass time when mapping SWE by comparing two datasets of five-day averaged, boreal winter season (December, January, and February) SWE imagery for a ground validated prairie study area. The first dataset is derived from SSM/I morning overpass times, the second from afternoon overpass times. Correlation analysis and modified mean bias error calculations are used to quantify the association between the two datasets. In addition, a series of principal components analysis tests quantify the spatial and temporal association between the two time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→