MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1876147415 · doi:10.7202/009300ar

Émancipation ou colonisation ?

2004· article· fr· W1876147415 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Geneviève Rail, Mélisse Lafrance

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNikeHumanitiesColonisationArtEthnologyPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryAdvertisingArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir des Études culturelles féministes et postmodernistes, nous procédons à l’analyse de messages publicitaires réalisés par la compagnie Nike. Nous avançons que la « colonisation » du corps féminin faite par cette compagnie a nourri le sentiment postféministe dans l’imaginaire nord-américain. Nous illustrons la façon dont Nike a envahi l’univers sémiotique et social tout en misant sur des stratégies mondialistes qui permettent l’exploitation de femmes en Asie. Nous concluons en expliquant comment Nike en est arrivée à se positionner en tant que productrice non seulement de chaussures, mais aussi de discours sur la normalité et la vérité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.510
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207