Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article represents the collection of three separate papers created by nine PhD students, who had analyzed the novels of French writers and discussed the work with them during the roundtables. The central theme of the article is investigation and its role in L’Évaporation de l'oncle by Christine Montalbetti, La blonde et le bunker by Jakuta Alikavazovic, and Le dépaysement by Jean-Christophe Bailly. The narratives belong to different genres but the search for traces, the quest characterizes all three novels. Nevertheless, each author exploits these notions in his or her unique way. Moreover, the writers seem to reconsider classical theories that portray the result of an investigation as its purpose: instead, we discover the process of searching that does not lead to a distinct conclusion. Therefore, the three authors seek to involve the reader who is no longer a passive receiver of information, but turns into a true actor in charge of gathering hints and interpreting them. The article ends with implications for understanding how contemporary fiction reevaluates the concept of investigation and its impact on narration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".