MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W187615170

Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation

2005· article· en· W187615170 on OpenAlex
Xiao-Shan Gao, George Labahn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymbolic computationComputer scienceSymbolic-numeric computationAutomatic differentiationTheoretical computer scienceAlgebra over a fieldSoftwareComputationAlgorithmMathematicsProgramming languagePure mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ISSAC 2005 is a continuation of a well-established series of international conferences for the presentation of the latest advances in the field of Symbolic and Algebraic Computation. The first meeting of the series (1966) was held in Washington, DC, and sponsored by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Since then, the abbreviated name of the meeting has evolved from SYMSAM, SYMSAC, EUROSAM, EUROCAL to finally settle on the present name ISSAC. This 30th meeting was hosted by the Key Laboratory of Mathematics Mechanization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China from July 24 to July 27. The topics of the conference include, but are not limited to: Algorithmic mathematics. Algebraic, symbolic and symbolic-numeric algorithms. Simplification, function manipulation, equations, summation, integration, ODE/PDE, linear algebra, number theory, group and geometric computing. Computer Science. Theoretical and practical problems in symbolic computation. Systems, problem solving environments, user interfaces, software, libraries, parallel/distributed computing and programming languages for symbolic computation, concrete analysis, benchmarking, theoretical and practical complexity of computer algebra algorithms, automatic differentiation, code generation, mathematical data structures and exchange protocols. Applications. Problem treatments using algebraic, symbolic or symbolic-numeric computation in an essential or a novel way. Engineering, economics and finance, physical and biological sciences, computer science, logic, mathematics, statistics, education. Following tradition, ISSAC 2005 featured invited talks, contributed papers, tutorials, poster sessions, software exhibitions, and satellite workshops. This volume contains all the contributed papers which were presented at the meeting as well as the abstracts of the invited talks. The picture on the front cover shows a page from the classic Chinese math book bearing the title Jade Mirrors of Four Elements by Zhu Shijie, written in 1303 AD during the Yuan Dynasty. In this page, a system of equations of three unknowns and degree three is reduced to a univariate equation by eliminating variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207