Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISSAC 2005 is a continuation of a well-established series of international conferences for the presentation of the latest advances in the field of Symbolic and Algebraic Computation. The first meeting of the series (1966) was held in Washington, DC, and sponsored by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Since then, the abbreviated name of the meeting has evolved from SYMSAM, SYMSAC, EUROSAM, EUROCAL to finally settle on the present name ISSAC. This 30th meeting was hosted by the Key Laboratory of Mathematics Mechanization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China from July 24 to July 27. The topics of the conference include, but are not limited to: Algorithmic mathematics. Algebraic, symbolic and symbolic-numeric algorithms. Simplification, function manipulation, equations, summation, integration, ODE/PDE, linear algebra, number theory, group and geometric computing. Computer Science. Theoretical and practical problems in symbolic computation. Systems, problem solving environments, user interfaces, software, libraries, parallel/distributed computing and programming languages for symbolic computation, concrete analysis, benchmarking, theoretical and practical complexity of computer algebra algorithms, automatic differentiation, code generation, mathematical data structures and exchange protocols. Applications. Problem treatments using algebraic, symbolic or symbolic-numeric computation in an essential or a novel way. Engineering, economics and finance, physical and biological sciences, computer science, logic, mathematics, statistics, education. Following tradition, ISSAC 2005 featured invited talks, contributed papers, tutorials, poster sessions, software exhibitions, and satellite workshops. This volume contains all the contributed papers which were presented at the meeting as well as the abstracts of the invited talks. The picture on the front cover shows a page from the classic Chinese math book bearing the title Jade Mirrors of Four Elements by Zhu Shijie, written in 1303 AD during the Yuan Dynasty. In this page, a system of equations of three unknowns and degree three is reduced to a univariate equation by eliminating variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".