MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1876376600 · doi:10.1109/itherm.2004.1319207

Impingement air cooled plate fin heat sinks. Part II - Thermal resistance model

2004· article· en· W1876376600 on OpenAlexaff
Zhipeng Duan, Y.S. Mzychka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinHeat sinkThermal resistanceMechanicsLaminar flowAirflowReynolds numberThermalMaterials scienceHeat transferInletFlow resistanceThermodynamicsFlow (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTurbulenceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For pt.I, see ibid., vol.I, no., p.429-35 (2004). Impingement air cooling with heat sinks is one attractive solution in thermal management of electronic components. A simple impingement flow thermal resistance model based on developing laminar flow in rectangular channels is proposed. Experimental measurements of thermal resistance are performed with heat sinks of various impingement inlet widths, fin spacings, fin heights and airflow velocities to test the validity of the model. The accuracy of the predicted thermal resistance was found to be within 20% of the experimental data at channel Reynolds numbers less than 1200. The simple model is suitable for parametric design studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207