MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1877103549 · doi:10.15612/bd.2008.311

Hacettepe, British Columbia ve Simon Frazer Üniversitelerinde Belge Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

2008· article· tr· W1877103549 on OpenAlex
Özgür Külcü

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBilgi Dünyası · 2008
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Strategy and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Çalışmada Hacettepe Üniversitesi’nde belge yönetimi programlarının geliştirilmesi sürecinde kullanılmak üzere, Kanada ve Türkiye üniversitelerinde belge işlemlerine yönelik uygulamaların karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Türkiye’de üniversitelerde belge ve arşiv uygulamalarını yönelik idari koşullar, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Beytepe Yerleşkesi örneğinde değerlendirilmiştir. Uluslararası örnek olarak Kanada üniversite sistemi içerisinde yer alan British Columbia ve Simon Fraser Üniversitelerinde belge ve arşiv uygulamalarına ilişkin koşullar, Hacettepe Üniversiesi ile karşılaştırmak üzere incelenmiştir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it