MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1877280007 · doi:10.1346/cms-wls-10

Electrochemical Properties of Clays

2002· book· en· W1877280007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alanah Fitch

Bibliographic record

VenueClay Minerals Society eBooks · 2002
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryElectrodeEngineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The articles in this text have been assembled to give readers an idea of the large number of research possibilities associated with combining electrochemical methods with clay research. The first article is introductory in nature. It describes the common features of the diffuse double layer that intrigue clay chemists and electrochemists alike. Based on this common understanding it develops the flux equations that underpin all electrochemical experiments and ends by describing experimental details that the beginning electrochemists should be aware of when attempting to apply electrochemical methods to clays. The group of Fitch gives extensive review to applications of clay-modified electrode work in understanding flux of materials in clay films. At the workshop Dr. Janet Osteryoung presented the use of electrochemical methods, such as microelectrode cyclic voltammetry, in elucidating the charge of colloids. Dr. Osteryoung, at the time head of the NSF division of Chemistry, was unable to write an article, however the technique is extensively reviewed in the first article. The technique relies upon the difference in diffusion coefficient of a cation distributed between the diffuse double layer of a colloid and the bulk solution can be used to determine the distance between charges on the colloid. The first article also attempts to set the clay-modified electrode context for each of the other submissions in this volume: Yamagishi, Manias, Amonette, and Villemure. The use of clay-modified electrodes is detailed, particularly for the information it can give on diffusion in composite materials (see the article of Prof. Aki Yamagishi, now of the University of Tokyo). One of the problems with clay-modified electrodes has been in the structure of the films obtained and the thickness of those films. Yamagishi presents results using Langmuir Blodgett clay film formation using surfactants. Those clays films are then used in clay-modified electrodes to determine intrinsic electroactivity of very thin clay films. Along the same lines recent researchers are interested in the flux of both electroactive and electroinactive materials in nanocomposites of clays. One exciting area is that of polymer composites which are designed to give high sodium or potassium flux and good stability at relatively high temperatures. These membranes can be used in developing the next generation of fuel cells. The conductivity of such films exposes an interesting theoretical and experimental problem. E. Manias, A.Z. Panagiotopoulos, D.B. Zax and E.P. Giannelis of the Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemical Engineering, and Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University review some of the theoretical work which attempts to elucidate the mechanisms by which high sodium flux occurs in these nanocomposites. The introductory article by Susan Macha, Scott Baker, and Alanah Fitch of Loyola University Chicago covers some of the experimental electrochemical techniques used to determine the conductivities of these clay nanocomposite films. Another exciting area of application of electrochemistry to problems in clay chemistry is in the area of the direct reduction and oxidation of redox metals in clay crystals. This work is of practical interest because of its potential application to remediation of contaminated military sites. It is known that clay interceptor beds that are reduced with dithionite serve to control contaminant plumes. James E. Amonette of Pacific Northwest Labs gives a review of the reactivity of iron in clay minerals. This review is followed by an article by Prof. Gilles Villemure of University of New Brunswick, Canada, which shows some of the most successful electrochemical experiments involving direct reduction of metals in clay lattices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClay Minerals Society eBooksSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207