MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1877382745 · doi:10.1109/hcc.2002.1046351

Concrete programming with reactive objects

2003· article· en· W1877382745 on OpenAlex
Simon Gauvin, Trevor J. Smedley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReactive programmingAsynchronous communicationObject (grammar)Programming languageMessage passingFunctional reactive programmingSemantics (computer science)Programming paradigmArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionInductive programmingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactive systems are characterized by an event driven collection of communicating components which respond to internal and external stimuli. We present an approach for enabling the visual development of reactive systems by combining object-orientation and message-passing. Taking the point of view that message-passing is a more natural model for reactive systems than call-based semantics we present the reactive object, a language independent extension to object-oriented programming that adds facilities for inter-object asynchronous communication. The use of concrete visual representations of entities in the domains of message-passing and object-oriented programming we show that reactive objects have the potential to simplify the development of reactive systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it