Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humor is a shared characteristic of human beings. Among various kinds of humor, teasing is one of the most risky forms. Teasing related to sex is even more sensitive in most cultures. As is learned in previous studies, females tease less than males in general and both males and females tend to tease males more than females. It is due to the power difference and social asymmetry between different genders. This phenomenon is what has been found in natural occurrence of teasing. However, it is not the case in entertaining TV programs. We examined two Chinese TV talk shows, and found that the hostess is as aggressive as the host when making sexual teasing towards guests. Furthermore, the host/hostess does not consider the gender of the guests when teasing them about sexuality. That is in contrast with the natural occurrence. The explanation to this difference can be attributed to the asymmetrical power between hosts/hostesses and guests in the entertaining TV programs. Key words: sexual teasing, gender, power, entertaining TV programs Resume: L’humour est une caracteristique partagee des etres humains. Parmi les diverses sortes d’humour, la taquinerie est une des formes les plus risquees. La taquinerie relative au sexe est meme plus sensible dans la plupart des cultures. D’apres les etudes precedentes, on sais que les femmes taquinent generalement moins que les hommes, et que tous tendent a taquiner les hommes plutot que les femmes. Cela est du a la difference de puissance et a l’asymetrie sociale entre les deux sexes. C’est ce qu’on a trouve dans la taquinerie naturelle. Mais ce n’est pas le cas dans les programmes televises de divertissement. Apres avoir examine deux talk show televises chinois, nous avons trouve que l’animatrice est aussi agressive que l’animateur quand ils taquinent les invites. De plus, l’animateur ne considere pas le sexe des invites en taquinant sur la sexualite. C’est contraire a la situation normale. Cette difference est attribuee a l’asymetrie de puissance entre l’animateur et les invites dans les programmes televises de divertissement. Mots-Cles: taquinerie sexuelle, sexe, puissance, programmes televises de divertissement 摘要：幽默是人類所共有的特點。在各種形式的幽默中，嘲弄是最冒險的形式之一。在大多數文化裏，與性有關的嘲弄尤為敏感。以往的研究中曾經提到，一般來說，同女性相比，嘲弄更容易發生在男性身上；而不論對女性還是對男性而言，他（她）們的嘲弄對象多是男性。這是由於兩性之間的力量差異以及社會地位不對稱性所造成的。這一特點是由在自然情況下發生的嘲弄現象中所總結出來的。然而，在電視娛樂節目中卻不儘然。本文對兩個中國電視脫口秀節目進行了研究，發現在對嘉賓進行“性”嘲弄的時候，女主持人在攻擊性方面與男主持人不相上下。另外，男女主持人在進行“性”嘲弄的時候並沒有刻意考慮嘉賓的性別。這些現象與自然情況下十分不同。這種差異可以由電視娛樂節目中主持人和嘉賓之間不對稱的力量關係來解釋。 關鍵詞：“性”嘲弄；性別；力量；電視娛樂節目
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".